How to install Records Management in All-In-One (AIO) project for Alfresco SDK 4.1

[Yves1]

Hello everyone!

Please i would like to know how to add Records Management support to an Alfresco project created using the SDK 4.1. Many documentations show how to do it for lower versions of the SDK, i will to know how to do it for the version 4.1 of the SDK.

Thanks.

[abhinavmishra14 · Accepted solution]

Records Management (governance services) is an amp which you can include in your repository docker module (e.g. <yourRepoModule>-platform-docker) and share docker module (e.g. e.g. <yourRepoModule>-share-docker). It would automatically apply the feature to both repo and share. Give it a try.

These are dependencies for RM:

<dependency>
  <groupId>org.alfresco</groupId>
  <artifactId>alfresco-governance-services-community-repo</artifactId>
  <version>3.4.0</version>
  <type>amp</type>
  <exclusions>
	<exclusion>
		<groupId>*</groupId>
		<artifactId>*</artifactId>
	</exclusion>
  </exclusions>
</dependency>

<dependency> 
  <groupId>org.alfresco</groupId>
  <artifactId>alfresco-governance-services-community-share</artifactId>
  <version>3.4.0</version>
  <type>amp</type>
  <exclusions>
	<exclusion>
		<groupId>*</groupId>
		<artifactId>*</artifactId>
	</exclusion>
  </exclusions>
</dependency>

Enterprise version:

<dependency>
  <groupId>org.alfresco</groupId>
  <artifactId>alfresco-governance-services-enterprise-repo</artifactId>
  <version>3.4.0</version>
  <type>amp</type>
  <exclusions>
	<exclusion>
		<groupId>*</groupId>
		<artifactId>*</artifactId>
	</exclusion>
  </exclusions>
</dependency>

<dependency>
  <groupId>org.alfresco</groupId>
  <artifactId>alfresco-governance-services-enterprise-share</artifactId>
  <version>3.4.0</version>
  <type>amp</type>
  <exclusions>
	<exclusion>
		<groupId>*</groupId>
		<artifactId>*</artifactId>
	</exclusion>
  </exclusions>
</dependency>

You can find a demo project here for reference: https://github.com/abhinavmishra14/governance-services-demo

[adamsmitt]

Hi there. Thanks for the link now it is much more understandable.

[abhinavmishra14]

---

@adamsmitt wrote:

Hi there. Thanks for the link now it is much more understandable.

---

Glad its helpful, marking this thread closed.