AnsweredAssumed Answered

Should a non-executable process definition be persistable?

Question asked by gerry.fisher on Nov 12, 2010
This is a question to the Activiti development team:

Some workflows contain processes that are clearly not meant to be executable:

<process id="sid-07bb0baa-771f-4f57-9147-d0b3031d7ac2" isClosed="false" isExecutable="false">

Is it necessary to persist such definitions in table ACT_RE_PROCDEF? Looks to me as if they're just cluttering up the table.

Outcomes