AnsweredAssumed Answered

Asynchronous continuation and BPMN transactions

Question asked by andregs on Dec 15, 2011
Latest reply on Dec 17, 2011 by trademak
This topic kind of follows this old one: http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2605

I’m rethinking here and I still argue that each user task, service task, call activity etc. should be executed in its own transaction. I mean, activiti:async="true" by default.

If I want to enclose multiple tasks in a single transaction, I should do it with BPMN transactions, like this:

http://en.q-bpm.org/mediawiki/index.php/Transaction_%28BPMN%29

Does it make sense for you?

Will asynchronous continuation still be necessary on the day that BPMN transactions are supported by Activiti? They seem to have the same purpose.

Regards,

Outcomes